SPOILER ALERT - THE HUNDRED FOOT JOURNEY IS A FUSION OF MANY CULTURAL AND CULINARY STYLES, ALL ENTERTAINING TASTY SENTIMENTAL AND ANNOYING….
It has been a very long time since I intensely disliked a
film that I was so thoroughly engaged and entertained by. I cried (laughed a
little) all through it, but I was exhausted from an eight hour bus and train
journey from Quebec the day before so I would have cried at the drop of a hat.
By the end of the film, tear stained and enraptured by the irritation of incessant
and predictable romantic play, I almost wished I had saved the thirteen dollars
and just dropped my hat and wept.
And the business class boozy train journey included a lovely
conversation with a woman who shared her assessment of Canadian regional tastes
based on the kind of drink we order on trains. I ordered rum and coke, white
wine, and then a shot of Baileys as fond homage to my white trash heritage. She
ordered scotch, wine, and port - and had just seen the Faberge exhibit in
Montreal. So I was feeling a bit critical of the decorative, culinary and
libational arts.


By dismissing a young French man for similar hate crimes the
character becomes a sympathetic maternal force by default. By the end of the
film it isn’t too difficult to tell what she prizes more, a Michelin star or a
Michelin award winning man. She needs and wants both and does everything she
can to both lose and regain their attentions. The Hundred Foot Journey becomes
a parody of culinary and cultural traditions and makes high-end French cuisine
look like decorative appetizers alongside the more lavish Indian dishes. And
then of course fusion, the ever-popular contemporary form of mixed cuisine,
provides for a metaphoric grand narrative that ultimately makes all of the
people happy all of the time.


My favorite romantic narrative was the movement from the
village to Paris, where the prized young chef gets a new suave hairdo and grows
a bit of light sexy facial hair. My reading of this fashion move pushes all
culinary interests to the side and tells me that the beautiful young female
chef had to send her male competitor to the city in order to pretty himself up
before she could have carnal relations with him in the kitchen. But I am being
ridiculous about the sublime here and know in my heart of hearts that true love
is blind when it comes to physical attractiveness, tra la. The young chef comes
back to his kitchen collaborator looking sleek, scruffy, debonair and
irresistible all at once - when he had begun the film as a wide-eyed, beautiful
boy aspiring to the heights of cooking genius that his mother has instilled in
him. Damn!!! If Disney, Oprah, and Spielberg hadn’t made the film we might have
been treated to some fabulous fusion sex and the dishes would have been way dishier.
The acting is lovely, the scenery is divine, and the empty
country road between the two restaurants is harrowing in its emptiness as
couples nonchalantly wander across a hundred foot stretch of cultural mayhem
and make one wonder whether a Stephen King version with a ghost driven monster
truck filled with croissants and lentils might have made the opening line of
the film a little richer and less simplified - “We cook to make ghosts.”
Releasing the spirits of food, cultural difference, and romantic intrigue
becomes a garden of earthly delights, but unlike the famous painting by
Hieronymus Bosch, these delights lack the relentless presence of hell on earth.
There is hell, of course, but it is all so Disney’fied. So go see it. Like me,
you may laugh, cry and crave South Asian cuisine all through it.
And
the limp asparagus scene was priceless.
No comments:
Post a Comment